Active installationsNewAdoption metric — not a quality score
WordPress.org ratingNo WordPress.org ratings yet
Official packageDirect from WordPress.org
Repository metrics are context, not quality scores. Active installations measure adoption and can strongly reflect a plugin’s age and historical popularity. Ratings, recent updates and “Tested up to” metadata also do not guarantee modern code, error-free operation, security, feature completeness or suitability for a particular site. Why active installs don’t tell the whole story →
WP PlugIndex currently records Humanify Content Grader version 1.2.1 as active, updated 5mo ago and tested up to WordPress 6.9.
Overview
About this plugin
Humanify Content Grader analyses your post content in real time and gives it a score from 0 to 100 based on how AI-generated it sounds. The lower the score, the more human your writing reads.
The plugin works directly inside the WordPress editor — in the block editor sidebar or as a meta box in the classic editor — so you can check and improve your writing before you hit publish.
What makes it different
Most SEO plugins focus on keyword density and meta tags. Humanify Content Grader focuses on something more important right now: whether your content reads like a human wrote it. AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are increasingly favouring content that sounds natural and authoritative.
Robotic writing gets ignored.
What it detects
AI buzzwords — delve, leverage, utilize, seamlessly, pivotal, holistic, synergy, etc.
AI phrases — “it’s worth noting”, “in today’s rapidly evolving”, “in conclusion”, etc.
Leftover AI artifacts — “I hope this helps”, “Certainly!”, “As an AI”, etc.
Em dash overuse — one of the strongest AI writing signals
Sentence length uniformity — AI tends to write in suspiciously even sentences
Lack of contractions — AI writes more formally than humans
Passive voice overuse
Repetitive sentence openings
Hedging language — “arguably”, “in many cases”, “broadly speaking”
Redundant phrasing — repeated 3-word phrases across the content
Weak AI-style conclusions — “in summary”, “as we have seen”, etc.
Missing first-person voice
No data points or statistics
How the score works
0–20: Sounds very human
21–40: Mostly natural
41–60: Some AI signals
61–80: Reads quite robotic
81–100: Very AI-like
Privacy
All analysis runs entirely in your browser using JavaScript. No content is ever sent to an external server. The plugin makes no external HTTP requests of any kind.
Who is it for
SEO professionals auditing client content
Content writers who use AI as a starting point and want to humanise the output
WordPress site owners who want to ensure their content reads naturally
Digital marketing agencies checking content quality before publishing
WordPress.org metadata
Plugin tags
Topics listed for this plugin in the WordPress.org directory.
ai
content
gutenberg
seo
writing
Compatibility & maintenance
Compatibility & maintenance
Tested up to WordPress 6.9
Not yet marked as tested with WordPress 7.1. WordPress.org currently lists Tested up to 6.9.
Current WordPress releaseWordPress 7.1
WordPress.org Tested up to6.9
Minimum requirementsWordPress 6.0 · PHP 7.4
Update activity15 May 20265mo ago
“Tested up to” is directory metadata supplied by the plugin author. WP PlugIndex does not turn an older declaration into a claim that the plugin is incompatible.
Changes recorded by WP PlugIndex
Recent tracked changes
No tracked version or compatibility changes have been recorded by WP PlugIndex yet.
Tracking & source
WP PlugIndex tracks public WordPress.org directory metadata and records selected version, compatibility and availability changes as they are detected.
